Steinhoff scandal: Justice or slap on the wrist for guilty Gerhardus Burger?
Gerhardus Burger’s conviction in the Steinhoff insider trading scandal raises eyebrows. With a suspended sentence, was justice really served?
The Steinhoff scandal, South Africa’s largest corporate fraud case, shocked the country when it came to light in December 2017.
At the centre of it all was Markus Jooste, the CEO who resigned amidst “accounting irregularities” that wiped out 98% of the company’s share value, costing investors R200 billion.
The collapse left pension funds, shareholders, and ordinary South Africans in financial ruin. Now, seven years later, the scandal has led to its first conviction, but some question if the penalty fits the crime.
Burger’s Role: Insider Trading at Steinhoff
Dr. Gerhardus Burger, a 79-year-old physician affiliated with Steinhoff, was arrested and convicted of insider trading. The Daily Maverick reports that Burger, one of four individuals who received a tip-off via SMS from Jooste, quickly sold over 39,000 Steinhoff shares before the stock plummeted.
The Financial Markets Act (FMA) clearly defines insider trading as a crime. Section 78(2) of the FMA makes it illegal for anyone in possession of confidential price-sensitive information to trade on that information or encourage others to do so. For Burger, acting on Jooste’s advice, this was his undoing.
Penalties Under the Financial Markets Act
The minimum and maximum penalties for insider trading under the FMA are severe. If found guilty, offenders can face a fine of up to R50 million or imprisonment for up to 10 years, or both. Civil liabilities may also include repaying up to four times the amount of any benefit gained from the illegal trade. Despite these heavy penalties, Burger’s sentence has raised eyebrows.
A Suspended Sentence
On 26 September 2024, Burger appeared before the Pretoria Specialised Commercial Crimes Court and pleaded guilty to three counts of insider trading. His sentence: five years in prison, fully suspended for five years. This means that if Burger stays out of trouble for the next five years, he will never serve a day behind bars.
Additionally, the court ordered the confiscation of €90,000 (around R1.8 million) that Swiss authorities had seized from Burger’s accounts following the Steinhoff collapse.
Weighing the Sentence
Given the scale of the Steinhoff scandal, many feel that Burger’s suspended sentence is a slap on the wrist. Though Burger agreed to cooperate and testify against other Steinhoff executives, critics on X argue that his involvement, even at the periphery, warranted a stiffer penalty.
Presumably, the mitigating factors considered by the court in sentencing were his advanced age, his cooperation with law enforcement, and the fact that this was his first offence.
Cooperation or Complicity in Steinhoff Scandal?
Burger’s role in the scandal remains a contentious issue. While he wasn’t directly involved in the financial misconduct that brought down Steinhoff, he clearly acted on confidential information. His willingness to testify against his accomplices, such as Steinhoff’s former CFO, Andries “Ben” la Grange, may have influenced his lenient sentence.
However, the public feels uneasy. In a scandal that devastated so many, can we really say justice has been served?
The Road Ahead in Steinhoff drama
As Steinhoff’s legal saga continues, with key players such as La Grange and Stephanus Grobler facing trial, Burger’s conviction is likely just the beginning. But the question lingers: is this a victory for the criminal justice system, or a sign that corporate fraudsters can escape with minimal consequences?
A Slap on the Wrist?
While Burger’s cooperation with law enforcement may have earned him leniency, many argue that his sentence pales in comparison to the devastation caused by Steinhoff’s collapse. Is this really justice for the millions of South Africans whose pensions and investments were decimated?
Conclusion: A Call for Accountability
As Steinhoff’s case continues, South Africans are left wondering: can we truly trust the system to hold corporate criminals accountable? Burger’s suspended sentence may not provide the reassurance that justice is being served. As more key figures in the scandal prepare to face trial, the public demands more than just symbolic convictions—they want real accountability.
DO YOU THINK BURGER’S CONVICTION IS JUSTICE OR A SLAP ON THE WRIST?
Let us know by clicking on the comment tab below this article or by emailing info@thesouthafrican.com or sending a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. You can also follow @TheSAnews on X and The South African on Facebook for the latest news.